检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨永辉[1,2] 丁晋利[3] 武继承[1,2] 何方[1,2] 韩伟锋[1,2] 杨先明
机构地区:[1]河南省农业科学院植物营养与资源环境研究所,河南郑州450002 [2]农业部作物高效用水原阳科学观测站,河南原阳453514 [3]郑州师范学院,河南郑州450046 [4]郑州锦荣生物科技有限公司,河南郑州450002
出 处:《土壤通报》2012年第5期1065-1072,共8页Chinese Journal of Soil Science
基 金:国家863节水农业项目(2006AA100215);公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费项目(201203077);河南省杰出青年基金项目(104100510024)资助
摘 要:为探明保水剂在不同水分条件下小麦生长过程中对土壤结构的作用过程与机理,在盆栽试验条件下研究了不同保水剂用量(T1:0 mg kg-1、T2:27 mg kg-1、T3:54 mg kg-1、T4:81 mg kg-1)对冬小麦拔节期和收获期的土壤结构和入渗能力的影响。结果表明:保水剂改善了冬小麦生长过程中的土壤结构,提高了土壤结构的稳定性和入渗能力。轻度胁迫条件下,随保水剂用量的增加,>0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量提高,土壤结构稳定性增强,且拔节期效果更显著;充分灌水条件下,各处理中以T3和T4处理>0.25 mm水稳性团聚体含量较高。除T4处理外,随小麦生育期的推进土壤饱和导水率有所降低。而不同水分条件下,各处理中均以T4处理的饱和导水率较高,但轻度胁迫的处理高于充分灌水的处理。与充分灌水相比,在轻度胁迫条件下,保水剂的施用更有利于改善土壤结构,提高土壤结构稳定性和导水能力,但到小麦收获时土壤结构稳定性以充分灌水条件下的处理较佳。综合以上分析,各处理均有T4处理的改土效果为佳。In order to ascertain the action process and mechanism of waterretaining agent on soil structure in the growth of crop, the effects of different dosage of waterretaining agent (T1 : 0 mg kg^-1, T2 : 27 mg kg^-1, T3 : 54 mg kg^-1, T4:81 mg kg1) on soil structure and infiltration capacity were studied at jointing and harvest of wheat in a potting experiment condition. The results indicated that waterretaining agent improved soil structure during the growth of wheat and increased soil structure stability and infiltration capacity. Under mild stress condition, the amount of 〉 0.25 mm aggregate and soil structure stability improved with the increase of waterretaining agent, and there was more significant effect at jointing stage. Under filling irrigation, these of Treatment 3 and Treatment 4 were the best compared with other treatments. In addition to Treatment 4, soil saturated hydrauhc conductivity decreased with the growth of wheat. Under different moisture conditions, saturated hydraulic conductivity of treatment 4 was highest in different treatments, hut that of treatments under mild stress was higher than filling irrigation. Compared with condition of filling irrigation, the application of waterretaining agent improved soil structure and promoted soil structure stability and infiltration capacity under mild stress condition. However, soil structure under filling irrigation was more than that under mild stress condition when harvesting. It concluded that T4 could obtain the best effect in treatments under different water conditions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90