检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南昌大学第一附属医院呼吸内科,南昌330006
出 处:《实用临床医学(江西)》2012年第8期100-102,共3页Practical Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的通过对比研究探讨微量注射泵对人工气道持续湿化的效果。方法将80例插管或气道切开患者随机分为2组:研究组40例采用微量注射泵持续推注湿化气道,对照组40例采用传统的气道滴注湿化法。观察﹑比较2组的湿化效果、相关并发症发生情况、吸痰次数、吸痰前后的血氧饱和度。结果研究组的湿化效果明显优于对照组(P<0.01)、相关并发症发生率及吸痰次数明显低于对照组(P<0.01)、对患者血氧饱和度的影响明显小于对照组(P<0.01)。结论微量注射泵对人工气道持续湿化的效果明显优于传统气道滴注。Objective To investigate the effect of micro-injection pump on artificial airway humidification.Methods Eighty patients undergoing tracheal intubation or tracheotomy were randomly assigned to receive either continual artificial airway humidification with micro-injection pump(investigation group,n=40)or traditional airway instillation humidification(control group,n=40).Humidification effects,complications,frequency of sputum aspiration,and blood oxygen saturation before and after sputum aspiration were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with control group,continual artificial airway humidification with micro-injection pump significantly improved humidification effects and obviously decreased the incidence of complications,frequency of sputum aspiration and influence on oxygen saturation(P〈0.01).Conclusion Continual artificial airway humidification with micro-injection pump is superior to traditional airway instillation humidification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117