检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金姗姗[1]
出 处:《长江论坛》2012年第4期58-65,共8页Yangtze Tribune
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目“我国村民政治功效感的来源和价值研究”(项目编号1OYJC810020)的阶段性成果.
摘 要:在关于政治参与影响政治效能感的研究中,国外学者发展出了“工具说”、“发展说”和“结果说”三种解释框架。虽然三种解释不尽相同,但学者普遍认为积极的政治参与对政治效能感有一定的正面影响,尽管影响的因素,程度和范围存在不同。本文基于浙江省闾村实证调研,发现选举式的参与活动均未能显著影响政治效能感和村民效能感。甚至在村民的投票行为与主观期望的结果相一致时,亦未能发现其对效能感的显著影响。Researches on political participation influences political efficacy, toreign scholars devel- oped three explanatory fames as: "instrumental perspective", "development perspective" and "outcome-con- tingent perspective". The three kinds of interpretation varies, the scholars generally believe that active politi- cal participation has some positive effects on political efficacy, although, there are differences exist in the im- pact of the causes, the extent and scope. The dissertation selects lv village(闾村) of Zhejiang Province as a sample, trying to test the applicability of this theory in rural China. This paper find that electoral participation failed to affect the sense of political efficacy obviously expected result is consistent. , even when the villagers voting behavior and subjective
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49