检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐道彬[1]
出 处:《黄山学院学报》2012年第4期26-30,共5页Journal of Huangshan University
基 金:教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大课题(12JJD750016);教育部人文社科规划基金项目(10YJA770060)
摘 要:近代以来,关于清代乾嘉考据学派的研究,有所谓"吴派"、"皖派"和"扬州学派"的争议。江藩是乾嘉汉学的中坚人物,有人依据师承关系,称之为"吴派后劲";或据其自署地望,谓之"扬州学派精英";或溯源其祖籍,而归之于"皖派后学",故今日学界难置其位。因此,在讨论江氏归属哪一种学派时,不免产生"三派分立是否成立"的质疑。而这一质疑的深入,也会涉及到清代学术研究的其他问题。In recent rears, the study on Qianjia textual research school in the Qing Dynasty has a socalled controversy about Wu School and Wan School and Yangzhou School. As the most important figure of Qianjia sinology in the Qing Dynasty, jiang Fan is considered "a descendant of Wu School" based on master-apprentice relationship, or "elite of Yangzhou School" based on the place where he lived, or "a descendant of Wan School" according to his ancestral home. Since it is difficult to arrange his academic position today, the suspicion that the separation of three schools doesn't hold water inevitably occurs when discussing to which school Jiang Fan belong. And the deepening of this suspicion will touch upon other issues of academic research in the Qing Dynasty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.21.26