检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所上海市法医学重点实验室,上海200063
出 处:《中国司法鉴定》2012年第2期37-38,47,共3页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81001354)
摘 要:近年来,交通伤后遗智力缺损或精神障碍伤残评定日益增多,实际评残操作不规范,造成鉴定意见不一致经常发生,影响鉴定质量和交通事故处理。当前,部分鉴定机构及其鉴定人的资质问题已经受到交通事故处理机关的质疑,也引起司法鉴定管理部门的关注。对此,就精神伤残评定资质问题从程序规定角度和技术操作层面展开讨论,力图为精神伤残评定的规范操作提供一些思路。In recent years, there arise more and more disability assessments of intellective defects and mental disorders caused by traffic accidents. As a result of non-standard operations in the practice, the inconsistence of assessment conclusions occurs frequently, which harms the assessment quality and affects disputes resolution regarding traffic accident compensation. So far, the qualification of some assessment bodies and their examiners has been questioned by traffic management departments, and has also drawn the attention of forensic identification administration sectors. With the aim to provide some ideas on the operational standardization of mental disability assessment, this article discusses the topic associated with the qualification for mental disability assessment from two aspects: procedures and technical operations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.219