鉴定人出庭作证新论——兼论新《刑事诉讼法》的相关条款  

Discussion on the Expert Testimony in Court——Also on the New Criminal Procedural Law

作　　者：陈邦达[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610064

出　　处：《中国司法鉴定》2012年第3期19-24,共6页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(10CFX041);中国行为法学会课题<社会转型期司法鉴定不信任问题研究>[(2010)学研029]

摘　　要：近年来,刑事诉讼中诸多冤假错案暴露出有瑕疵的鉴定意见造成法官对案件事实认定错误的问题,使鉴定人不出庭现象备受指摘,各方要求鉴定人出庭的呼声不绝于耳。然而,鉴定人出庭作证必须以案件具备其出庭必要性为前提,在鉴定意见质证机制尚未完善之前,如若忽视质证效果而一味强调鉴定人出庭,无异于叶公好龙。深刻洞察制约鉴定人出庭之因素,理性评估出庭作证之效果,客观认识质证功能虚化之成因,才能有助于鉴定意见的审查判断,科学构建鉴定人出庭作证的机制。In recent years,many unjust and incorrect cases were caused by wrong findings about the facts incurred by defected forensic appraisal reports.The phenomenon that appraisers are not testified in court trials attracts much criticism from the society.It is strongly urged that appraisers appear in court.However,appraisers’ appearing in court should be based on necessity.Until the inquiry rules are formed,it will not be a wise decision if we establish compulsory rules to solve this problem.We should analyze the factors influencing appraisers’ testifying in court,evaluate the effect of this mechanism,and find out the reasons for its weakness,so as to establish a sound mechanism for appraisers’ appearing in court.

关 键 词：鉴定人出庭 出庭率 质证 效果 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]