1919年外蒙撤治事:功过孰论?——《独立评论》关于“外蒙撤治”的一场论争  

A Study ofOuter Mongolia's Abandoning its Autonomy in 1919: A Debate in Independent Review

作　　者：冯建勇[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院中国边疆史地研究中心,北京100005

出　　处：《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第5期49-57,共9页Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"民国时期中央政府对边疆地区之统合研究"阶段性成果;项目编号:11CZS026

摘　　要：1936年4月至7月,民国外交史专家张忠绂先生与徐树铮之长子徐道邻先生以《独立评论》杂志为平台,围绕1919年外蒙撤治事展开了持久的论争。双方主要围绕以下两个问题展开了辩论:一是外蒙撤治中究竟谁系主动?二是关于徐树铮在撤治事的功过问题。透过这一论争,我们能够发现一些颇有价值的历史细节,这有助于我们更为全面、客观地理解外蒙撤治事,尤其是此期中央政府在外蒙撤治进程中的立场和地位。通过对这场论争的解读,我们会发现,很多时候历史的进程并非沿着直线演进;对历史人物的是非评价,亦并非是黑白分明、昭然可判。From April to July in 1936, Mr. Zhang Zhongfu who was good at the diplomatic his- tory of the Republic of China and Mr. Xu Daolin who was the eldest son of General Xu Shuzheng launched a lasting debate in Independent Review on the issue of Outer Mongolia^s a- bandoning its autonomy in 1919. Both sides centered mainly on the following two questions： First, which took the initiative, Outer Mongolia or the Central Government？ Second, what was the role of Xu Shuzheng in this event？ This debate reveals some valuable historical details, which can shed much light on Outer Mongolia^s abandoning its autonomy and the role of the Central Government. This research reveals that in many cases the course of history is not a line- ar evolution while historical figures are not absolutely right or wrong.

关 键 词：外蒙撤治 张忠绂 徐道邻 《独立评论》 

分 类 号：K2[历史地理—历史学]