检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴夏平[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学中文系,北京100871
出 处:《山西师大学报(社会科学版)》2012年第5期131-135,共5页Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:历史经验表明,技术革新必将导致学术变异。古籍数字化对现代学术进程具有积极作用,但同时也带来负面效应,或可导致学术异化。以下三方面值得特别注意:一是知识被遮蔽伪化研究论断;二是数字鸿沟拉大区域学术落差;三是技术伪装学问使伪学术加剧。因此,积极开发语义检索系统,加大研发主体公益性与商业性协作力度,正确使用数字化成果,应是去除信息时代学术异化的有效途径。Historical experience has shown that technological innovation will necessarily lead to academic devi-ation. Digitalization of ancient books has positive effect on the development of modem scholarship, at the same time it also has the negative effect of leading to academic deviation. There are three points worthy of attention : research conclusions will be disguised; digital gap will enlarge regional academic distance; and technology disguising knowl- edge will increase pseudo academic achievements. Therefore, the best approach to the elimination of academic de-viation should be developing semantic retrieval system, increasing the collaboration between public welfare and commercial interest, and adopting the digital achievements properly.
关 键 词:古籍数字化 学术异化 知识遮蔽 数字鸿沟 技术伪装学问
分 类 号:G644[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13