检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周长军[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学法学院
出 处:《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年第5期62-68,共7页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:2010年"教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划"项目;国家社科基金项目"公诉变更的法律规制研究"(项目编号10BFX045)的阶段性成果
摘 要:近些年来,精神病人犯罪问题逐步进入公众关注的视野,疑似精神病人刑事责任能力的评定成为困扰各级司法机关的难题。在当下中国语境中,为化解疑似精神病人犯罪案件处理实践中的诸多困境,疑似精神病人刑事责任能力的评定应当遵循如下原则:程序启动方面的理性适度原则;评定权配置方面的法官主导原则;程序运行方面的当事人参与原则;决策方面的"宽入严出"和"存疑从有"原则。In recent years, public attention has been drawn to the crimes committed by insanity patients. The particularly imminent issue confronting the judiciaries is to identify the criminal responsibilities of suspected insanity patients. In the current context, in order to dissolve all the dilemmas in cases wherein insanity patients are involved, it is necessary to follow certain basic principles, against which the criminal liabilities of suspected insanity patients are identified. Such principles include : the principle of reasonableness at the initial stage of proceedings, the judge-centered principle in distributing ruling power, the principle of the participation of parties in terms of procedural operations, the principles of easy taking in and strict release as wells as criminality in presence of open questions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145