检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国石油化工股份有限公司勘探开发事业部,北京100728
出 处:《石油实验地质》2012年第5期490-494,共5页Petroleum Geology & Experiment
基 金:中国石化科技攻关项目"鄂尔多斯盆地油气成藏规律与主控因素研究"(P05041)资助
摘 要:新增探明储量由于资料所限,不能采用动态法标定可采储量,最常用的方法是类比法、经验公式法和经验值法等,如何准确预测采收率是合理计算可采储量和新增探明储量评审工作的技术关键与难点。该文在充分调研采收率预测现状与存在的主要问题基础上,对比新增探明储量各种采收率预测方法优、缺点,提出了新增探明储量采收率预测方法顺序为经验值法(小型油藏)—类比法验证(中型油藏)—经验公式法—综合地质法—数值模拟法进一步验证(大型油藏),建立适合本公司油藏地质特征的类比序列和经验值标准,为新增探明储量采收率预测提供依据。For the newly-proved reserves,dynamic methods are not qualified to predict recoverable quantity due to the lack of production data.The methods used most widely include analogy,empirical formula and empirical value methods.It is difficult and believed to be the technical key point to accurately predict recovery rate in review of the calculation of newly-proved and recoverable reserves.According to the current situations and problems of recovery rate prediction,it has been presented in this paper the merits and demerits of all kinds of methods for recovery prediction.The selection-order of these methods is from empirical value method(small field),analogy verification method(medium field),empirical formula method,comprehensive geological method to numerical modeling for further verification(big fields).The analogy series and empirical value standards applicable to the SINOPEC oil fields have been built,providing supports for the recovery rate prediction of newly-proved reserves.
分 类 号:TE15[石油与天然气工程—油气勘探]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147