对“效用侵害说”理论的本土化检讨  

Questioning on "Utility Infringement Doctrine" from the Local Perspective

作　　者：王振[1] 

机构地区：[1]江西科技师范大学法学院,江西南昌330013

出　　处：《湖南警察学院学报》2012年第4期28-33,共6页Journal of Hunan Police Academy

摘　　要：在刑法解释学领域,针对我国刑法第二百七十五条的故意毁坏财物罪的"毁坏"内涵的"效用侵害说"正成为有力的学说;但是",效用侵害说"在本质上是一种实质刑法观的解释思维路径,而这种解释思路及解释结论在根本上极易与权力联姻从而成为驭民之术,不符合初创阶段我国法治的本土现状,并且会锈蚀罪刑法定原则,从而直接摧毁中国法治的根基。对"毁坏"内涵的解释应该遵循法律语言的经验认知规律,应该能够揭示行为的破坏性之本质特征。In the field of criminal law explanation, the ＂Utility Infringement Doctrine＂ has becoming a strong effecting theory to delimit ＂destruction＂ of the article 275 in Chinese criminal code. In fact, the ＂Utility Infringement Doctrine＂ belongs to the substantive criminal law interpretation concept.. The substantive criminal law interpretation concept is very harmful to the ruling of law at present China, as it＇s easy to connect the political power. In this paper, the author suggest that it is very important to interpret the concept and connotationof ＂destruction＂.

关 键 词：毁坏 效用侵害说 实质刑法解释观 罪刑法定 法律语言 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]