检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘丽萍
机构地区:[1]江苏省镇江市京口区人民检察院,江苏镇江212003
出 处:《太原师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2012年第4期53-56,共4页Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:台湾刑法与大陆刑法中分别存在预备犯与犯罪预备概念,两者虽称谓与性质不一,但两者所指涉的对象却同一,表述上的差异并不影响对两者的理解。世界范围内预备犯(犯罪预备)的处罚模式存在较大差异,尤其是立法模式与处罚原则方面。统观世界范围内预备犯(犯罪预备)的处罚模式,台湾刑法与大陆刑法对预备犯(犯罪预备)规定的差异清晰可见,在比较中借鉴与完善是大陆刑法孜孜以求的发展方向。There are preparatory crime in Criminal Law of Taiwan region of China and preparation for a crime in Criminal Law of mainland in China respectively. Although they are different in appellation and character, they are identical in referent. The differences in expressions don't affect their understanding. There are many differences in the punishment patterns of worldwide preparatory crime ( preparation for a crime), especially in legislative model and punishment principle. When we compare the punishment patterns of worldwide preparatory crime (preparation for a crime), the differences between preparatory crime in Criminal Law of Taiwan region of China and preparation for a Crime in Criminal Law of mainland in China is distinct. Drawing lessons from comparison and consummating the Criminal Law of mainland in China is what we are pursuing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.43.72