检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海财经大学信息管理与工程学院,上海200433 [2]上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院,上海200052
出 处:《管理科学学报》2012年第9期10-19,共10页Journal of Management Sciences in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金重大资助项目(79990580);国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70533030);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71001059)
摘 要:决策是管理的核心,决策贯穿管理的全过程.群体决策中会产生海量的研讨信息,研讨信息与决策方案之间存在多种关系.论文研究了群体决策中多种研讨信息关系的自动识别方法,构建了多种研讨信息关系自动识别模型,并应用于实际的群体决策过程.应用结果表明,该模型较好地实现了研讨信息与决策方案之间强烈支持、一般支持、中立、一般反对和强烈反对关系的自动识别,可以辅助人对群体研讨信息的整理和分析,提高了群体决策过程信息组织的效率.Decision making is essential to management. A lot of argumentation information is produced in group decision-making. There are multiple relationships between the argumentation information and decision solution. In this paper, a automatic identification method of multiple argumentation information relationship in group decision-making is researched and put forward. A automatic identification model of the argumentation information relationship in group decision-making is built. Furthermore, the method is applied to actual group decision process. The results of the application show that the method realizes the automatic identification of the strongly supportive, supportive, neutral, strongly against, and against relationship between decision solution and argumentation information effectively. It can help group members to organize the large amount of argumen- tation information effectively and increase the efficiency of information organizing in group decision-making.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.5.184