检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任春娟[1]
机构地区:[1]天津市公安医院,天津300042
出 处:《中国儿童保健杂志》2012年第10期951-952,955,共3页Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
摘 要:【目的】比较Vitapex根管糊剂与传统根充糊剂治疗乳牙根尖周炎的疗效。【方法】对180例193颗根尖周炎的乳牙进行根管治疗,随机分成实验组90例98颗牙齿和对照组90例95颗牙齿。实验组采用Vitapex注射型根管糊剂,对照组采用传统根充糊剂。治疗后6个月和12个月追踪观察,对治疗效果进行比较。【结果】实验组与对照组治疗成功率,6个月分别为94.90%、85.26%,12个月分别为93.68%、82.42%,差异有统计学意义(6个月χ2=5.05、12个月,χ2=5.66,P均<0.05)。【结论】Vitapex糊剂用于乳牙根尖周炎的治疗可有效提高其成功率。[Objective] To compare the curative effect of Vitapex paste and traditional root canal filling paste in the treatment of periapical periodontitis of deciduous teeth. [Methods] 180 cases including 193 with periapical periodontitis of deciduous teeth were randomly divided into two groups:test group(98 teeth) and control group(95 teeth). The test group was obturated with Vitapex paste. The control group was obturated with traditional root canal filling paste. The clinical efficacy was observed after 6 months and 1 year. [Results] The treatment success rates of test group and control group were 94.90% and 85.26% after 6 months(χ2=5.05 ,P〈0.05). The treatment success rates of test group and control group were 93.68% and 82.42% after 1 year(χ2=5.66,P〈0.05). [Conclusion] Vitapex is successful and effective for periapical periodontitis of deciduous teeth.
分 类 号:R174[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28