要物合同立法的比较法考察——以近现代模范民法典为考察对象  

The Comparative Study of the Provision of Real Contracts in the model modern civil codes and its Inspiration

作　　者：蒋军洲[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南工业大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《信阳师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第5期36-40,共5页Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：河南工业大学高层次人才科研启动基金项目(2009BS024)

摘　　要：通过对世界上具有不同意识形态、其居民有不同宗教信仰的国家或地区的多部民法典的考察,可以得知要物合同制度式微的看法没有依据。但这些立法例似乎呈现出要物合同制度与意思自治原则之间存在着冲突。鉴于此,二者是否真的存在冲突就必须给予回答。面对此种所谓冲突,建议不能盲目确认其存在,从而主张完全废除要物合同制度以求解决,而应谨慎地思考前述冲突的产生原因及要物合同存续的原因,慎重对待要物合同的前途。Through the comparative study of many civil codes of different Country or district which has a different ideology and the residents of which have a different religion, we ean know that there is no foundation of the opinion that real contracts decline. But the precedent of legislation appears that real contracts conflict with private autonomy. Accordingly, it should be given a persuasive answer to the problem that it really exists a conflict or not. With regard to the cordlict above, it is suggested that we dont blindefuIly confirm it and argue to abolish real contracts to solve such problem, and should carefully think of the reason that why the conflict emerges and the real contract have been reserved till now,

关 键 词：民法典 要物合同 合意主义 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]