检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李永洪[1]
机构地区:[1]西华师范大学政治学研究所,四川南充637009
出 处:《西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年第5期1-7,共7页Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences
基 金:四川省教育厅人文社会科学青年基金项目(09SB122)
摘 要:我国农村基层民主近年来在广度和深度上都得到了较大发展。但是,在这种发展的表象背后,却隐藏着农民政治冷漠的客观真象。对此,既有的"复合因果论"具有一定解释力,但也有值得补遗之处。农村基层民主制度运行成本与运行绩效的不对称、农民个体承担的基层民主制度运行成本过高才是导致当前农民政治冷漠的根本原因。In recent years there is great development of the rural grass-roots democracy in China in the breadth and depth. However, there is an objective truth of peasants' political apathy behind the developing appearance. The "composite theory of causation" has interpretive force about the peasants' political apathy during the rural grassroots democracy practice to a certain extent, but there is the space for addenda. The fundamental reason for the peasants' political apathy is that the cost of running and the performance of running of the rural grass-roots democracy system is not asymmetry, and the current cost of running of the grass-roots democracy system borne by peasants is too high.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229