检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵磊[1]
机构地区:[1]四川大学法学院,成都610207
出 处:《长春大学学报》2012年第9期1137-1140,共4页Journal of Changchun University
摘 要:我国在立法中并未确立私权神圣原则,因此而导致了实践中的诸多问题。私权神圣在我国是应当被确立的,应当属于法治建设的题中应有之意。笔者立足我国实际在同西方国家的对比和我国的现有制度,探讨了私权神圣的内涵,私权与公权间的私权神圣、不同主体间的私权神圣、同一主体的不同种私权间的私权神圣,以及私权神圣的界限。The principle of private right sanctify has not been established in China’s legislation,which resulted in many problems in practice.Private right sanctify should be established in our country,and should belong to the proper meaning of the title of the rule of law.Based on China’s actual situation and our existing system in comparison with western countries,this paper explores the connotations of private right sanctify,the sanctify of private rights between private rights and public rights,the sanctify of private rights among different subjects,the sanctify of private rights among different kinds of private rights in the same subject,and the boundary of private right sanctify.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.250.2