剩余劳动与刘易斯转折的国际经验及理论反思  

SURPLUS LABOR AND LEWIS TURNING POINT

作　　者：郭金兴[1] 宋蓉蓉[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学经济研究所,天津300071

出　　处：《经济理论与经济管理》2012年第10期25-31,共7页Economic Theory and Business Management

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(NKZXB10027)

摘　　要：本文通过梳理国外剩余劳动与刘易斯转折的实证研究,发现剩余劳动和非充分就业是经济发展中长期存在的现象,不仅广泛存在于发展中国家,也存在于发达国家的某些地区或部门中。由于城市非正规经济也是剩余劳动的重要蓄水池,农业剩余劳动的减少和消失不宜作为判定刘易斯转折的直接证据。由于经济发展过程和现象的复杂性,判断是否已经跨越了刘易斯转折,需要综合运用多种标准和方法。The paper analyzed the international experiences of surplus labor and Lewis turning point. The findings were as follows： firstly, surplus labor and non-full employment were long term existence in the process of economic development, both in developing economies and developed economies; secondly, the decrease and disappearance of surplus labor in agricultural sector were not the direct proof of Lewis turning point, because the surplus labor would move to the informal sector in urban; thirdly, it required to apply multiple standards to verify the Lewis turning point, due to the complexity of economic develop- ment.

关 键 词：剩余劳动 刘易斯转折 国际经验 

分 类 号：F249.2[经济管理—劳动经济]