剑桥资本争论之谜——实物还是货币、技术关系还是社会关系  

Mystery of the Cambridge Capital Debates——Physical or Money &Technical Relations or Social Relations

作　　者：柳欣[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学经济研究所,天津300071

出　　处：《学术月刊》2012年第10期62-71,共10页Academic Monthly

摘　　要：20世纪50—80年代,经济学界发生了一场决定经济学走向的空前激烈的理论争论,即"剑桥资本争论"。这场争论揭示出目前居经济学主流地位的新古典理论的逻辑矛盾。然而,究竟是什么原因导致其理论的逻辑矛盾却没有被揭示出来,特别是争论双方都没有意识到揭示这种逻辑矛盾所暗含的理论意义和经验意义,以致这场争论完全流产。在当前经济危机背景下重新梳理出的"剑桥资本争论"的逻辑内涵,不仅深刻表明逻辑矛盾产生的真正原因所在,而且表明这场争论所引申出的一个重要结论,即目前国民收入核算体系中的所有由货币量值表示的统计变量完全由社会关系或特定的货币金融体系决定,而与主流新古典理论基于生产函数的技术分析无关。There were a series of heated debates that determined the future direction of economics in the economic circle in the 50--80s of 20th century, which announced the logical contradictions in the mainstream neoclassical economics. However, precisely what caused the logical contradictions was not entirely revealed, especially neither side realized the theoretical and applied values so that the debates miscarried finally. Under the background of current economic crisis, while tracing the logical track of the Cambridge capital debates again, we can not only indicate the real cause of the debates, but also demonstrates that it can be obtained an important conclusion from the debates, that is, all of statistical issues showed by monetary values in the current national income accounting system are entirely determined by social relations or special monetary financial system, which has nothing to do with technical analysis based on production function of the mainstream neoclassical theories.

关 键 词：剑桥资本争论 货币 社会关系 古典-马克思一般均衡 

分 类 号：F091[经济管理—政治经济学]