学术期刊转企改制的困惑与出路  

The Confusion and Path of System Reform of the Academic Journals

作　　者：王学青[1] 戴兵[1] 仇慧[1] 

机构地区：[1]南通大学杂志社,江苏南通226019

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第5期136-140,共5页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：中国科技期刊学研究基金项目(GBJXC1252);中国科技期刊学研究基金项目(GBJXB1211)

摘　　要：新闻出版总署近期发布了《关于报刊编辑部体制改革的实施办法》,学术期刊面临转企改制的大考,对此各地热议不断,直接影响到贯彻落实的具体方案的出台。究其原因,一方面是因为改革对象本身的复杂性使然,另一方面则是因为主管部门对改革路径的选择存有认识上的误区。国外学术期刊的商业化是建立在成熟的出版市场基础之上的,而我国目前的期刊出版市场还不太健全,完全在政府的主导下走"先改制后市场"的路子,可能导致改革阻力增大,成本提高,且缺乏持续发展的动力。正确的改革路径应该是"先市场后改制",期刊管理部门须从"政府—改制—市场"的运作模式转变为"政府—市场—改制"的运作模式:首先要改革现有的期刊管理体制,打开市场之门;其次是建立科学的期刊评估标准,培育市场,规范市场;然后让市场进行资源整合,引导学术期刊的转企改制。如此,学术期刊改革才会健康有序地进行,学术期刊的专业化、特色化、集约化、规模化发展方能水到渠成。The specific measures to reform the academic journals publishing unit has not been released, on the one hand, because the object of the reform is complexity, the other hand, there are some problems on the reform path selec- tion. Commercialization of foreign academic journals is built on the basis of a mature publishing market, and our current journal publishing market is far from perfect. The government hopes to build journals publishing market through the sys- tem reform of academic journals. This will inevitably lead to resistance to change increases, raising the cost, and lack of sustained development. The correct approach should be take is the first market after the system reform. The administrative department of the academic journal must change the operation mode from the ＂government - system reform - market＂ in- to the ＂government - market - system reform＂.

关 键 词：学术期刊 转企改制 政府-改制-市场 政府-市场-改制 

分 类 号：G239.20[文化科学]