检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘方[1] 赖莉芬[1] 韩志海[1] 舒六一[1]
机构地区:[1]海军总医院,北京100048
出 处:《中国医药导报》2012年第28期165-166,共2页China Medical Herald
摘 要:目的探讨是否严格按照质控标准操作对气道阻力(Raw)检查结果的影响。方法采用Elite/DXTM体积描记仪对60例受检者分别以方法一(浅快呼吸,频率90次/min左右,较小潮气量)和方法二(深快呼吸,频率90次/min左右,较大潮气量)进行常规Raw测定。结果用方法二测定的Raw数值比用方法一测定的大,两种方法结果差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论做好检查前的准备工作,严格控制质量标准,以较小潮气量的浅快呼吸法测定Raw,对于结果的准确性,以及对于患者病情的判断据有重要意义。Objective To investigate the effect on the airway resistance (Raw) test result by whether operating in strict quality control standards. Methods 60 cases of routine Raw determination in method 1 (shallow fast breathing, frequency of about 90 beats/min, small tidal volume) and methods 2 (deep fast breathing, frequency of about 90 beats/min, large tidal volume) by Elite/DXTM plethysmograph were selected. Results The values of Raw detected by method 2 were larger than by method 1, the difference of the results of two methods was statisticalty significant (P 〈 0.01). Conclusion Good prepara- tion before inspection, strict quality standards and by the method of small tidal volume and shallow breathing have im- portant meaning for the accuracy of the results and the judgment of the patient's condition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28