著作权法定许可与默示许可的功能比较与立法选择  

Function Comparison and Legistative Choice between Copyright Statutory License and Implied License

作　　者：王国柱[1] 李建华[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《法学杂志》2012年第10期150-154,共5页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"我国民法典中私权一体化与三元结构的立法设计"(项目编号:11YJA820038);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大招标项目"我国民法典中私权保护制度的立法设计"(项目编号:09JJD820010);吉林大学创新团队建设项目"权利本位与中国民法法典化"的阶段性成果

摘　　要：著作权法定许可与默示许可具有制度构造上的相似性,但两者也存在着明显的差异,默示许可具有独立的制度价值。我国现行法律法规对法定许可与默示许可的"杂糅式"规定不合理,而《著作权法》修改草案中的"分离式"规定相对可取。默示许可与法定许可相比更适应网络环境的制度需求,具有更广阔的适用前景。应在公益事业和体现互联网开放性与共享性的行为中扩大默示许可的适用范围。There are not only similarities in systematic construction between copyright statutory license and implied license, but also significant differences, implied license has independent value. It is unreasonable of taking statutory license and implied license as a hybridity type in China＇s existing laws and regulations, it is preferable to make separate provisions in revised draft of Copyright Law. Compared to the statutory license system, implied license adapts to the network environment more perfectly, and has broader application prospects. We should expand the application scope of implied license in respects of public good and behavior reflecting internet openness and sha- ring.

关 键 词：法定许可 默示许可 立法选择 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学]