检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐崇利[1]
出 处:《中国社会科学》2012年第10期186-204,208,共19页Social Sciences in China
基 金:作者主持的2009年教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“全球金融危机后国际经济秩序重构与中国的法律对策研究”(批准号:09JZD0021)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:我国学界历来把发展中国家建立国际经济新秩序的斗争主要界定为诉求"特殊与差别待遇"之举。然而,晚近新兴国家不断崛起,与发达国家间经济实力差距趋于缩小。于是,中国等新兴国家开始向发达国家主张"平等与无差别待遇"。此等新路径的开辟,可能意味着正在推动继20世纪80年代初之后一度潮落的发展中国家建立国际经济新秩序的斗争将再掀高潮。有鉴于此,学界在继续研究传统路径的同时,应更加关注此等新路径的开辟对和平发展之中国的意义,从而完整、准确地把握中国参与重构更加公正之国际经济秩序斗争的基本态势。Chinese scholars have tended to define the struggle of developing countries for the establishment of a new international economic order as one in pursuit of'special and differential treatment.'However,the rise of new emerging countries in the late modern period has narrowed their gap with developed countries in economic power.Consequently,the emerging countries including China have begun to seek'equal and undifferentiated treatment'from the developed countries.The blazing of such a new trail may indicate a resurgence of the developing countries'struggle to establish a new international economic order that has ebbed since the 1980s.Therefore,in pursuing their traditional research approach,Chinese scholars should pay more attention to the significance of new trailblazing to the peaceful development of China,so as to better assess the basic tendency of China's participation in the struggle for a fairer international economic order.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.183