检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大庆油田第四采油厂测试大队 [2]华北油田第四采油厂
出 处:《油气井测试》2000年第1期12-15,共4页Well Testing
摘 要:对目前所用的“松Ⅰ”法推算二次加密井平均地层压力普遍偏低这一现象进行了分析 ,认为以“松Ⅰ”法为代表的“定积法”计算平均地层压力不适应二次加密井储层开采特点。研究应用了一种适合推算二次加密井储层开采特点的平均地层压力计算方法———压力恢复“速度法” ,并通过地层压力实测资料对该方法的计算结果进行了验证 ,同时也给出了该方法的应用条件。结果表明 ,用该方法计算的平均压力能较准确地反应二次加密井的真实压力水平。This paper analyzes the phenomenon that the average formation pressure of second time infill wells reckoned with presently using'Song I. 'method is particularly low, it indicates that calculation of average formation pressure with 'definite volume method'represented by'Song I 'does not adopt to reservoir development characteristics of second time infill wells. This paper studies and utilizes a calculation method for reckoning average formation pressure-pressure build-up'velocity method',which is suitable to reservoir development characteristics of second time infill well, and verifies file calculation results of the method through actual formation pressure data, at the same time the application conditions of the method are also given .The results show that the average pressure calculated with the method can accurately illustrate real pressure level of second time infill wells.
分 类 号:TE353[石油与天然气工程—油气田开发工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249