中美媒体对罢工事件报道的比较研究  

Comparative Study on Strike Report of US Media and China Media

作　　者：韩运荣[1] 冯梦兰[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国传媒大学电视与新闻学院 [2]天津体育学院运动与文化艺术学院

出　　处：《国际新闻界》2012年第9期65-74,共10页Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication

基　　金：中国传媒大学2009年382人才工程"国外应对突发性危机的舆论调控机制研究"项目(项目编号W2009382306)的阶段性成果~~

摘　　要：在社会转型期,劳动关系的不稳定构成了社会问题的常态,如果由劳动关系不协调所引发的劳工危机得不到适当的解决,很可能会导致社会动荡。在不同的社会背景及劳动关系机制下,其处理方式有所不同。笔者分别选取了2005年美国的纽约公交系统大罢工和2008年我国重庆出租车司机罢工事件,来研究中美媒体对劳工危机的报道的异同,力图通过比较,探析媒体在促动劳工危机解决中的功用差异。研究总体发现中美媒体的报道中呈现出了美国政府法治特征和中国政府的人治特征。In the transformation of societies, the harmonious labor relations is important to social solidarity. If we don＇t treat the labor relations properly, we might have labor crisis or other serious social problems. Different social background and employment legislation may lead to various results. In this paper, we have a comparative study of the strike reports of US media and China media. We take the 2005 New York transit strike and the 2008 Chongqing taxi strike for case study. Through the comparison, we try to figure out how US media and China media report the labor crisis in different ways. Then we＇ll explore the different features of two governments depict by media. On the basis of this comparative study, we find out that the feature of US government is rule of law and the feature of China government is rule of men. Keywords

关 键 词：罢工事件 中国媒体 美国媒体 内容分析 比较研究 

分 类 号：G212.2[文化科学—新闻学]