基于核心力量导向差异的乡村旅游制度比较研究——对贵州“天龙屯堡”、“郎德苗寨”与“西江苗寨”的实证分析  

Comparative Study of Different Rural Tourism Systems Based on Core-oriented Force:An Empirical Analysis of the Three Villages in Guizhou

作　　者：吴亚平[1] 陈志永[1] 

机构地区：[1]贵州师范学院区域旅游研究所,贵阳550018

出　　处：《热带地理》2012年第5期537-545,共9页Tropical Geography

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(07CMZ014);贵州省优秀科技教育人才省长专项资金项目[黔省专合字2009(118)号];贵州省教育厅高校人文社会科学研究专项任务项目(0705174)

摘　　要：通过对贵州3个典型乡村旅游地——平坝县天龙屯堡、雷山县郎德苗寨和西江苗寨旅游业的发展进行观察和研究,认为乡村旅游制度主要包括与旅游资源相联系以经营权为核心的产权制度、乡村旅游主要经营组织的运行体制、政府的政策倾斜及具体管理制度3个方面内容。以此为依据,对3个乡村旅游地从制度安排视角进行了横向比较:以社区居民、企业、政府为核心力量导向的乡村旅游地在制度安排上呈现巨大差异,实质上反映出各相关利益主体的不同利益诉求和利益博弈。不同的制度安排建立在乡村景区具体现实的资源条件和经济社会条件之上,乡村旅游制度一旦被建构,又对乡村旅游发展走向产生深层次影响。Three typical villages in Guizhou, which are Tianlongtunbao in Pingba County, Langde Miao Village and Xijiang Miao Village in Leishan County, are taken as examples to study the development of tourism industry of rural areas. The authors hold that the system of rural tourism would include mainly three aspects： property right system based on management right that is linked to tourism resources, operating system of the main rural tourism organizations, and government policy inclination and its management system. On that basis, the three rural tourism villages are horizontally compared from the perspective of institutional arrangements： village tourism strength oriented by community residents, businesses and government shows huge differences in the institutional arrangements, which reflect different interest demands and games in the relevant stakeholders＇ aspirations. Different institutional arrangements should be built on the concrete reality in rural scenic resource conditions and socio-economic conditions. When the rural tourism system is constructed, it would affect profoundly rural tourism development.

关 键 词：乡村旅游 核心导向力量 制度安排 比较分析 贵州 

分 类 号：F590.1[经济管理—旅游管理] F592.7[经济管理—产业经济]