检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡丹[1]
出 处:《亚太传统医药》2012年第10期17-19,共3页Asia-Pacific Traditional Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较奋乃静片含量测定的两种不同方法。方法:采用UV-对照品法和HPLC法分别测定奋乃静片的含量。结果:UV-对照品法测得奋乃静在0.996~8.964μg/mL的范围内与吸收度呈良好的线性关系,平均回收率为99.9%,RSD=0.25%(n=9)。HPLC法测得奋乃静在8.048~40.24μg/mL的范围内线性关系良好(r=0.9999,n=5),测得平均回收率为99.9%,RSD=1.09%(n=9)。结论:HPLC法准确度高,线性关系良好,与UV-对照品法测得结果一致,可用于奋乃静片的质量控制。Objective:To compare two different methods of determining the content of perphenazine tablets. Methods: Perphena- zine tablets were determined by UV and HPLC. Results: The linear range of UV and HPLC was 0. 996μg·mL-1-8. 964μg·mL-1 , and 8. 048μg·mL-1-40.24μg·mL-1 ; the average recoveries of UV and HPLC was 99.9% with RSD=0.25% (n=9) ,and 99.6 % with RSD = 1.09 % (n= 9). Conclusion : The HPLC method is accurate, good linear relationship, the reselt of two methods are similar, it can be used for the quality control of perphenazine tablets.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33