检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]山西医科大学公共卫生学院预防医学系(太原),中国030001 [2]山西医科大学人文社会科学学院
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2012年第9期1436-1437,共2页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:山西医科大学大学生创新项目基金(201103)
摘 要:目的探讨医科院校国家励志奖学金获得者应对方式与自我效能的现况及二者间的关系。方法采用《特质应对方式问卷量表》(TCSQ)和《一般自我效能感量表》(GSES)对128名励志奖学金获得者进行问卷调查。结果①励志奖学金获得者特质应对方式中积极应对(t=11.542,P<0.01)和消极应对(t=6.216,P<0.01)得分均高于常模;②励志奖学金获得者特质应对方式中积极应对与自我效能显著正相关(r=0.37,P<0.01);消极应对与自我效能存在显著负相关(r=-0.279,P<0.01);结论①医科院校励志奖学金获得者的应对方式多元化,积极应对和消极应对方式并存;②医科院校励志奖学金获得者的自我效能与应对方式密切相关。Objective To explore the current situation of trait coping style and general self-efficacy of medical students' who have gained the national motivational scholarships and their relationship.Methods A total of 128 students were evaluated with General Self-efficiency Scale and Trait Coping Style Questionnaire Scale,and according to the survey interview with a self interview outline.Results ①The scores of TCSQ of study objects were significantly higher than the norm(P0.01);②There were significant positive correlation between study objects' positive coping style and general self-efficacy(r=0.370,P0.01);There were significant negative correlation between study objects' negative coping style and general self-efficacy(r=-0.279,P0.01).Conclusion ①Trait coping styles of medical students who have gained the national inspirational scholarships are diversified,Positive coping style and negative coping style are coexistent;②A close correlation exists between study objects' positive coping style and general self-efficacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117