中国主要基金的中文论文产出绩效比较  

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

作　　者：周萍[1] 张旭[1] 周冬梅[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国科学技术信息研究所,北京100038 [2]西华师范大学外国语学院,四川南充637009

出　　处：《科技管理研究》2012年第19期43-48,53,共7页Science and Technology Management Research

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目"政府资助对知识生产作用的比较研究"(71073153)

摘　　要：以我国政府主要竞争性基金和国内期刊论文为对象,从不同角度分析了基金与中文论文产出的关系。研究发现,国家对研究开发的资助力度持续增加,但对基础研究和技术开发区别对待:在保障基础研究的同时积极支持技术开发。由于各地区的研发实力和规模存在显著差异,导致基金在各地区之间的分布不均,体现了竞争性基金的特点——能者多劳。国家自然科学基金对地区论文的贡献率在向均衡化方向发展,对学科的支持力度有所倾斜,生命科学、医学科学和材料科学获得资助份额最大,但学科论文产出与投资力度显著相关性不显著,基金对多数学科的贡献率增长显著。Based on publications indexed in the Chinese Science and Technology Papers and Citation Database （CSTPCD） and four major government funding resources, the paper analyzed relations between funding and publication productivity from different perspectives. Government funding to research and development has been increased continuously. Basic re- search and technology development are treated differently. Government＇ s basic policy can be generalized as： while ensu- ring basic research actively supporting technology development. Regional distribution of funding resources is highly skewed because of uneven distribution of research capability and scale, which also reflects the basic rules of competitive funding policies - funds goes with capability. Study based on the National Science Foundation of China （NSFC） shows that NS- FC＇ s contribution to regional CSTPCD publications is going towards even distribution ; Funding strength among science do- mains varies with life sciences, medical science and materials science benefit the most. Nevertheless, publication produc- tivity of science domains doesn＇ t correlates significantly with funding strength.

关 键 词：产出绩效 自然科学基金 “973”计划 “863”计划 

分 类 号：G311[文化科学]