论中国公司代表人制度的改革——以两大法系比较研究为视角  

On the Reform of Chinese Corporate Representative System——A view of comparison between civil law system and common law system

作　　者：杨汝轩[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学民商法学院,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《河北法学》2012年第11期67-73,共7页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：陕西省法学会2010年法学研究课题<中国公司代表人制度改革研究>

摘　　要：我国现行的公司法定代表人制度具有法定唯一性,体现了非常强的法律干预特征,实践中给公司经营带来了不便,同时产生了多方面的负面效果。考察两大法系主要国家的公司代表人制度可以发现,公司自治是各国代表人制度的基本原则,同时辅以必要的法律干预。我国的公司代表人制度存在诸多缺陷,应在公司代表人的产生、代表人模式等方面增强公司自治,另外严格代表人的责任,明确特别关系中的公司代表人,从多方面全面改革法定代表人制度。Chinese active corporate representative system has two main characters, statutory and exclusive. It reveals strongly governmental intervention of law. This results in inconvenience of corporate management and other negative effects. Based on the- investigation of two main law systems, it can be found that corporate autonomy is the basic principle in corporate representative system. At the same time there is necessary intervention. Chinese active system has many deficiencies. It should be reformed in many aspects, such as the emphasis of corporate autonomy in corporate representative pattern ＇s choice, definitude corporate representative＇s responsibility, and other corporate representative in special rela- tives.

关 键 词：法人人格 公司代表人 公司自治 法律干预 

分 类 号：DF411.91[政治法律—经济法学]