检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘麒光[1] 岳泉[1] 高婷[1] 吴笃俊[2] 黄航[3]
机构地区:[1]中国石化江汉油田分公司采油工艺研究院油田化学研究所,湖北武汉430035 [2]中国石化长庆油田分公司坪北经理部,陕西安塞717408 [3]长江大学地球科学学院,湖北荆州434023
出 处:《江汉石油职工大学学报》2012年第4期6-8,共3页Journal of Jianghan Petroleum University of Staff and Workers
摘 要:注水井调剖技术作为一种有效的提高采收率方式在坪北油田得到了广泛的应用,近年来在坪北油田的调剖施工次数呈逐年增多的趋势。在对坪北油田推广应用的两种调剖工艺技术进行对比分析的基础上,从调剖后的增油、注水压力变化、有效期、单井成本等方面进行了综合分析。提出了坪北油田的下一步调剖思路,为低渗透裂缝性油藏后期的稳油控水提供了技术支持。Profile control of water injection has been widely used as an effective way of raising recovery ratio in Pingbei Oil Field where the conduction of profile control is on the yearly increase.Based on the comparison of the two profile control methods that are employed in Pingbei,this paper makes a comprehensive analysis on every aspect from production increasing to water flooding pressure change and valid date and onto the costs of single well operation.In this paper,the further development of profile control in Pingbei Oil Field has been pointed out to provide technical support for stable production and water cut control at the later developing phase of the fractured reservoirs of low permeability.
分 类 号:TE1[石油与天然气工程—油气勘探]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229