检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洪伟[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学科学技术与社会研究所
出 处:《科学与社会》2012年第3期37-59,共23页Science and Society
摘 要:目前国内关于科学社会学的推介以默顿学派的理论为主,但对默顿之后科学社会学的发展没有进一步的追踪,而是转而关注科学知识社会学的理论,仿佛默顿科学社会学彻底消亡了。事实上,默顿科学社会学虽然在STS领域被彻底否定,在社会学内部也属于边缘化方向,但其学术价值在公共政策领域和经济管理领域得到充分的承认和应用,近年来可见度正在逐步提高。本文试图对科学分层方向、科学合作方向、科学对经济的影响及衍生研究方向做一梳理,以促进后默顿时代的科学社会学在其本源学科的发展。Textbooks on the sociology of science in China have been focusing on the Mertonian sociology of science. For the post-Merton era, attention has been directed to theories on the sociology of scientific knowledge, as if the Mertonian sociology of science has been extinct. In fact, although the Mertonian sociology of science was denied legitimacy in STS and has been a marginal concentration in sociology, its value has been appreciated in the areas of public policy and management studies and its visibility is increasing. This paper reviews previous studies in stratification in science, research collaboration, and the impact of science on economies to promote the development of the sociology of science in its original discipline.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.140.250.173