检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:洛若愚[1] 邹志波[1] 石小燕 龚巧芹[3] 吴莲芝[1] 詹丽丽[1] 倪园园[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学人民医院,武汉430060 [2]武汉中心医院,武汉430014 [3]青海大学医学院附属医院,西宁810001
出 处:《生殖与避孕》2012年第10期700-705,共6页Reproduction and Contraception
摘 要:目的:系统评价复方米非司酮配伍米索前列醇终止早期妊娠的临床效果。方法:根据系统评价原则进行计算机检索,并通过筛选与质量评价,对符合要求的文献利用REVMAN 5.0进行数据分析,绘制森林图。结果:共纳入了11个随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial,RCT),Meta分析结果显示:试验组(复方米非司酮组)对比对照组(米非司酮组)有提高完全流产率[OR=2.60,95%CI(1.77,3.82),P<0.001]和缩短阴道出血时间的优势,差异有统计学意义[WMD=-2.66,95%CI(-3.28,-2.04),P<0.001]。试验组有减少阴道出血量的趋势,但组间比较差异无统计学意义[SMD=-4.46,95%CI(-10.98,2.05),P=0.18]。结论:复方米非司酮配伍米索前列醇终止早期妊娠的临床疗效优于米非司酮,具有提高完全流产率、缩短出血时间的优势。Objective: To evaluate the clinical effects of compound mifepristone tables and misoprostol tables on induced interruption of early pregnancy. Methods: Internet search was performed according to the principles of systemic assessment, the articles obtained after searching were analyzed and the forest riot was drawn by REVMAN 5.0 software after screening and assessing. Results: Elevern randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, the results of Meta-analysis showed that there was a significant difference between compound mifepriston and mifepriston in improving the rate of complete abortion [OR=2.60, 95%CI (1.77, 3.82), P〈0.001] and shortening the bleeding time [WMD =-2.66, 95%CI (-3.28, -2.04), P〈0.001]. Though compound mifepriston can reduce blood loss, there was no significant difference [SMD=-4.46, 95%CI (-10.98, 2.05), P=0.18]. Conclusion: The clinical effects of compound mifepriston on terminating early pregnancy are better than those of misoprostol, with advantages of increasing rate of complete abortion, and shortening the bleeding time.
关 键 词:复方米非司酮片 米索前列醇 早孕 流产 出血 系统评价
分 类 号:R169.42[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.8