检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]甘肃省第二人民医院麻醉科,甘肃兰州730000 [2]兰州大学第二医院麻醉科,甘肃兰州730030
出 处:《甘肃医药》2012年第10期730-732,共3页Gansu Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:观察研究臂丛神经阻滞双点法与单点法用于上肢手术时的麻醉效果,比较三组间神经阻滞效果、止血带反应和辅助用药情况。方法:选择90例上肢手术病人,ASAI-II级,手术时间2~5小时,按随机双盲法分为A、B、C三组,每组30例。A组:肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞法,使用0.3%罗哌卡因和1%利多卡因混合液20ml。B组:腋路臂丛神经阻滞法,使用0.3%罗哌卡因和1%利多卡因混合液20ml。C组:肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞联合腋路臂丛神经阻滞法,肌间沟阻滞使用0.3%罗哌卡因和1%利多卡因混合液20ml,同时腋路阻滞使用0.3%罗哌卡因和1%利多卡因混合液20ml。结果:双点阻滞法较单点阻滞法镇痛效果更完善,阻滞时间更长,止血带反应减少,基本未用辅助药。结论:双点阻滞法克服了单点法对尺侧或者桡侧阻滞不全的不足,止血带反应轻,病人舒适度过手术期。Objective:To observe the anesthetic effect between double points method and single point method of bracehial plexus block on upper limb surgery patients,and to compare nerve block effect, tourniquet reaction and auxiliary drugs in three groups. Methods: 90 cases of upper limb surgery patients with ASAI-II grade and 2-5h operational time were divided into A, B,C three groups(30 cases in each group) according to a randomized double blind method. Group A: interscalene brachial plexus block,using mixture 20ml of 0.3% ropivacaine and 1%lidocaine. Group B: axiUary brachial plexus block,using mixture 20ml of 0.3%ropivaeaine and 1%lidocaine. Group C: interscalene brachial plexus block combined with axillary brachial plexus block method, using respectively mixture 20ml of 03%repivacaine and 1%lidocaine Results:Compared with single point brachial plexus block,analgesia effect of double block method was more perfect,block time was longer, the tourniquet reaction decreased,and usage amoun of auxiliary medicine was basically unused. Conelusima: Double point method overcomes the block insufficiency of single point method for ulnar or radial and tourniquet reaction is lighter,which is comfortable for patients through the operation period.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33