中国工业技术效率区域差异实证研究  

An Empirical Study of Regional Disparity of China's Industrial Technical Efficiency

作　　者：刘聪[1] 石奇[2] 刘玉飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京财经大学江苏产业发展研究院,南京210003 [2]南京财经大学财政与税务学院,南京210046

出　　处：《天津商业大学学报》2012年第5期42-48,共7页Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"产业优势响应产业政策的机理研究"(11BJY076);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"长三角地区外资代工模式下本土企业升级问题研究"(08JJD790139);江苏省哲学社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"面向产业优势的公共品供给:基于贸易政策与产业政策相互协调的研究"(2010JDXM007)

摘　　要：从技术效率假说出发,借助随机前沿生产函数模型,选取2003—2009年中国工业面板数据,分析研究了外资、市场化进程和劳动者素质对中国工业技术效率及区域差异的影响。研究表明,东中西部工业技术效率存在明显差异,这也加剧了中国工业区域发展失衡现象。其中,区域间的市场化程度发展不均衡,劳动者素质存在差异,这是中国三大地区工业技术效率差异的主要影响因素,这也符合了技术效率假说;而外资并没有真正地促进中国工业技术效率提高,这与理论预期有所不同。最后,提出政策建议:继续坚持加快市场化进程改革;注重提高劳动者素质;改变当前利用外资模式,引导和规范外资区域分布。Starting from the hypothesis of technical efficiency, this article analyzes the impacts of FDI, marketization and workers＇ quality on regional disparity of China＇ s industrial technical efficiency with the SFA model and China＇ s industrial panel data from 2003 to 2009. The results show that there exists great disparity of industrial technical efficiency in the eastern, central and western regions, which has aggravated regional imbalance in industrial development in China. The regional imbalance in marketization and workers＇ quality is the main reason for regional disparity of industrial technical efficiency in China, which corresponds with the hypothesis of technical efficiency. Besides, FDI doesn＇ t really promote China＇ s industrial technical efficiency, which doesn＇ t correspond with the hypothesis. Finally, the article offers some suggestions about speeding up the reform of marketization, improving workers＇ quality, changing the way of FDI utilization and regulating regional distribution of FDI.

关 键 词：工业 技术效率 区域差异 SFA 

分 类 号：F127[经济管理—世界经济]