检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴玉娟
出 处:《宁波广播电视大学学报》2012年第3期56-59,共4页Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University
摘 要:《联合国国家及其财产管辖豁免公约》明确宣告了绝对豁免主义的终结,其第三部分"不得援引国家豁免的诉讼"列举了不得援引管辖豁免的八种情形,其中商业交易是限制豁免原则的核心问题之一。《公约》规定了商业交易以"性质标准为主,目的标准为辅"的判定规则,并对商业交易界定中的国际私法问题及国家与国有企业行为的责任关系作出了规定。本文在对上述问题进行分析的基础上,指出《公约》在确立相对豁免原则及建立框架以协调各国在执行该原则的实践方面有重要意义。The UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and their Property clearly declares the end of the absolute doctrine of state immunity. Part 3 of the Convention entitled "Proceedings in which State immunity cannot be invoked" lists eight circumstances in which immunity cannot be invoked. Commercial transaction is one of the core questions in the restrictive doctrine and the Convention relies on the "nature plus purpose" test for judgment. Rules for questions related to international private law in commercial transaction judgment and responsibility between state and state-owned enterprise are also stipulated in the Convention. On the basis of analysis of the above issues, the paper points out the significance of the Convention in affirming the principle of restrictive immunity and establishing the framework to coordinate the restrictive immunity practices in different states.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185