检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金姗姗[1]
出 处:《宁波广播电视大学学报》2012年第3期74-81,共8页Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目“我国村民政治功效感的来源和价值研究”(项目编号10YJC810020)的阶段性成果.
摘 要:在关于政治参与影响政治效能感的研究中,国外学者提出了“工具说”、“发展说”和“结果说”三种解释框架.虽然三种解释不尽相同,但学者普遍认为积极的政治参与对政治效能感有一定的正面影响,尽管影响的因素,程度和范围存在不同.本文基于浙江省闾村实证调研,发现选举式的参与活动均未能显著影响政治效能感和村民效能感。甚至在村民的投票行为与主观期望的结果相一致时,亦未能发现其对效能感的显著影响。Researches on political participation influences political efficacy, foreign scholars developed three explanatory fames as: "instrumental perspective", "development perspective" and "outcome-contingent perspective". The three kinds of interpretation varies, the scholars generally believe that active political participation has some positive effects on political efficacy, although, there are differences existing in the impact of the causes, the extent and scope. The dissertation selects lv village (闾村) of Zhejiang Province as a sample, trying to test the applicability of this theory in rural China. This paper finds that electoral participation failed to affect the sense of political efficacy obviously, even when the villagers voting behavior and subjective ex- pected result is consistent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90