检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京军区总医院心血管内科,北京市100700
出 处:《中国心血管病研究》2012年第9期649-651,共3页Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Research
摘 要:目的 研究大剂量氯吡格雷用于选择性经皮冠脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的疗效及安全性.方法 确诊冠心病并接受择期PCI的患者173例,分成氯吡格雷强化组(波立维600 mg,87例)和氯吡格雷标准组 (波立维300 mg,86例).PCI治疗前两组患者分别给予波立维600 mg和波立维300 mg治疗;PCI术后每日分别给予150 mg和75 mg,共 7 d;以后均服用波立维75 mg至1年以上.观察两组患者的疗效及不良反应的发生情况.结果 氯吡格雷强化组和氯吡咯雷标准组达到的完全血运重建率分别为93.8% 和 87.2%(P<0.05);两组主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)发生率分别为2.0%和6.8%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);而出血和血管并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义(1.6%比1.7%,P>0.05).结论 氯吡格雷强化组PCI的疗效和安全性均优于氯吡格雷标准组.Objective To study therapeutic efficacy and safety of high dose clopidogrel in patients with coronary heart diseases (CHD) who underwent selective percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Methods A to-tal of 173 CHD patients underwent PCI were divided into strong clopidogrel group (received 600 mg of plavix, n=87) and standard clopidogrel group (received 300 mg of plavix, n=86). Before PCI, the two groups were respec-tively given 600 mg and 300 mg of plavix. They were respectively given 150 and 75 mg every day for 7 days after PCI. Then they were all given 75 mg every day over one year. Therapeutic efficacy and occurrence of adverse reac-tions were observed in the two groups. Results There were significant difference in complete revascularization rate (93.8% vs 87.2%, P〈0.05), major adverse cardiovascular-cerebral events (MACCE)(2.0% vs 6.8%,P〈0.01). There were no differences in bleeding and vascular complications (1.6% vs 1.7%, P〉0.05 ) between strong clopi-dogrel group and standard clopidogrel group. Conclusion Strong clopidogrel is more effective and safe than stan-dard clopidogrel in selective PCI of CHD.
关 键 词:大剂量 氯吡格雷 冠状动脉疾病 选择性 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
分 类 号:R541.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28