3种肠道清洁方法的效果比较  

Effect comparison of 3 bowel preparation methods

作　　者：曾伟红[1] 关小玲[1] 潘银珍[1] 林慕贞[1] 

机构地区：[1]佛山市顺德区第一人民医院,广东佛山528300

出　　处：《现代临床护理》2012年第8期40-42,共3页Modern Clinical Nursing

基　　金：佛山市科技攻关项目;项目编号为佛科201108192

摘　　要：目的探讨3种肠道清洁方法对患者舒适度、遵医行为及操作时间的影响。方法选择300例行肠镜检查患者,按照医嘱通知时间分为A组、B组和C组,每组各100例。分别采用清洁灌肠、口服蓖麻油和口服和爽(复方聚乙二醇电解质散)方法进行肠道清洁。比较3组患者舒适度、遵医行为和护理操作时间的差异。结果 C组患者舒适度和遵医行为均高于A组和B组;A组护理操作时间均长于B组和C组(均P<0.05)。结论采用口服和爽进行肠道清洁既能提高患者舒适度和遵医行为,又能缩短护理操作时间,是一种较好肠道清洁方法,值得临床推广应用。Objective To compare the effects of 3 bowel preparation methods on patients＇ comfort degree, medical compliance and operation time. Methods 300 patients preparing for abdominal surgery in general surgery department were divided according to enteroscopy registration time into group A, B and C and treated with 3 methods of bowel preparation before enteroscopy ： cleaning enema, oral administration of castor oil and oral administration of polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder, respectively. The patient＇s e.g., comfort degree, medical compliance and the time for bowel preparation were compared among the three groups. Results Group C was better than groups A and B at comfort degree and medical compliance, but there was no significant difference between group A and B at medical compliance. The time for bowel preparation in group A was longer than that in group B or C, but there was no significant difference between group B and C at time for bowel preparation. Conclusion The method of oral administration of polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder is comfortable, easy, convenient and shorter at bowel preparation time.

关 键 词：肠道清洁 清洁灌肠 舒适度 遵医行为 护理工作时间 

分 类 号：R473.6[医药卫生—护理学]