检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘恺
出 处:《重庆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年第5期123-128,共6页Journal of Chongqing Normal University Edition of Social Siences
摘 要:美国病人隐私权法经历了长时间的发展,形成了以《健康保险隐私及责任法》为主干,以《个人健康信息隐私国家标准》等为枝叶,以《公共卫生服务法》等为补充的,完整、全面、统一、协调的病人隐私权立法体系。本文在探析美国病人隐私权法的基础上,针对我国病人隐私权法存在的缺少完整的病人隐私权法体系,病人隐私信息范围过于狭窄,缺少电子医疗信息立法等问题提出了美国经验的立法启示。The U. S. patient privacy law has experienced a long development and evolved into a systemati- cally comprehensive, explicitly unified, and internally coordinated legal framework consisting of Health Insur- ance Privacy and Accountability Act as the base stone, National Standards for Privacy of Personal Health Infor- mation and the other several legislations as specific laws, and Public Health Service Act and the other several legislations as supporting laws. Based on examining and analyzing the U.S. patient privacy law, this article is aimed at putting forward implications for the flaws adhered to Chinese legislation with respect to patient' s right to privacy: a. lack of complete legal tion in regard to patient's privacy is framework to protect patient' s fight to privacy ; b. the scope of informa- defined too narrowly ; c. the absence of legislations governing Electronic Medical Records.
关 键 词:《美国健康保险隐私及责任法》 病人隐私权 病人隐私权立法体系
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.11.129