检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]苏州大学附属儿童医院中医科,江苏苏州215003
出 处:《辽宁中医药大学学报》2012年第11期195-196,共2页Journal of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:为了观察清肺化痰中药对儿童上气道咳嗽综合征的临床疗效。方法:文章选择将78例上气道咳嗽综合征的患儿随机分为中药组和中西药组(中药+美敏伪麻溶液),每组39例,采用咳嗽积分方法对临床疗效进行判定。结果 :两组对象治疗后咳嗽程度明显减轻,与治疗前比较均呈非常显著性差异(P<0.001);组间比较,中药加美敏伪麻溶液组积分平均值明显低于单纯服用中药组,统计学分析呈显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:由此可见,中西药结合疗法对儿童上气道咳嗽综合征临床效果更为显著。Objective:For observing the clinical therapeutic efficacy of the clearing lung and eliminating phlegm chinese drug in upper airway cough syndrome(UACS).Method:We divided 78 UACS children randomly into two groups,39 case in chinese drug group(C group),others in chinese and westen drug(chinese drug + Compound Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride Oral Solution,CW group),evaluated the clinical therapeutic efficacy with cough score method.Result:All the children cough had been alleviated obviously(P0.001),and the average cough score of CW group is obviously lower than that of C group(P0.05).Conclusion:Integrated traditional chinese and western medicine clinical therapeutic efficacy is more better than simply chinese drug therapy in UACS.
分 类 号:R256.11[医药卫生—中医内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28