检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈太清[1]
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学法律系
出 处:《安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012年第5期115-121,共7页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2011SJD820015);南京理工大学科研启动项目;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(NUST2012YBXM042)
摘 要:美国罚款制度极具特色和代表性。在设置上,美国罚款主要由立法创制,采用弹性限额,实行按日计罚。在实施上,美国罚款以民事诉讼为主导方式,以和解作为争端解决的重要机制,以执法经费与私人奖励作为款项用途。美国法的上述设计与探索,对于消解我国当下罚款治理中的罚款设置优化、执罚权分配、争端处理、款项用途安排等问题,具有一定的参考与借鉴价值。The civil penalty system of America has evident characters in set - up and actualization. In set - up, the penalty rule is mainly made by the legislation department. The limitation of penalties is flexi- ble. Each day of continuing failure to comply with a rule is treated as a separate violation. In actualiza- tion, the penalty procedure is mainly triggered by civil action and negotiation becomes an important mechanism to resolve disputes accordingly. The fund can be used as expenses for public execution or per- sonal rewards. Above -mentioned designs and explorations are valuable reference for the governance of civil penalty system in China in such issues as set - up optimization, distribution of administrative rights for penalty, solution of disputes and arrangement for fund use.
分 类 号:DF34[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222