检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学护理学院,江苏省210029 [2]南通大学附属医院肿瘤放疗科
出 处:《江苏医药》2012年第20期2434-2436,共3页Jiangsu Medical Journal
基 金:南通大学附属医院护理科研专项前期预研计划(Tfhz 1107)
摘 要:目的探讨自我护理干预对食管癌放疗患者自我护理能力和生活质量的影响。方法食管癌患者89例,按放疗先后顺序将患者分为A组(45例)和B组(44例)。两组均按照食管癌放疗护理常规进行护理,A组在护理常规基础上进行自我护理干预。比较两组患者放疗前后食管癌放疗知信行、自我护理能力及生命质量得分差异。结果自我护理干预后,A组患者对食管癌放疗知信行总分高于B组[(103.84±8.41)分vs.(85.73±10.56)分](P<0.05),自我护理能力得分也明显高于B组[(120.44±13.90)分vs.(111.11±12.64)分](P<0.05)。A组患者生活质量优于B组(P<0.05)。结论自我护理干预有助于提高食管癌放疗患者的自护能力和生活质量。Objective To investigate the influence of self-care intervention on self-care ability and quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Methods A total of 89 patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radiotherapy was divided into group A(45 cases, given additional self-care intervention) and B(44 cases, given conventional nursing for radiotherapy only). The scores of esophageal KAP, ability of self-care and quality of life were taken before and after radiotherapy. Results Esophageal KAP score of group A was higher than that of group B [(103.84± 8. 41) points vs. (85.73±10. 56) points] (P〈0. 05). So did the self-care ability [(120. 44±13. 90) points vs. (111.11±12. 64) points](P〈0. 05). The quality of life of group A was better than that of group B(P〈0. 05). Conclusion Self-care intervention is beneficial to the improvement of the ability of self-care and life quality in the patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radiotherapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15