检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京体育大学思想政治理论课教学部,北京100084
出 处:《廉政文化研究》2012年第5期6-11,共6页Anti-corruption and Integrity Culture Studies
基 金:2010年国家体育总局哲学社会科学课题(1556SS10106)
摘 要:随着经济社会的改革和竞技体育的发展,竞技体育比赛中的不正之风,尤其是足球领域的"假赌黑",引起了社会的强烈不满和高层的关注。借助治理理论可以发现,中国竞技体育管理体制未能形成政府、市场和第三部门相互制约、相互合作的有效治理框架,这是导致竞技体育不正之风滋生、蔓延的重要根源和体制原因。治理竞技体育领域的不正之风,应改革现有"政府独大"的管理体制,树立"多元并存、相互制约、分工合作"的治理理念,探索建立具有中国特色的竞技体育治理体制。Malpractices in the field of competitive sports, especially the problem of cheating, gambling and black whistle in Chinese football, arouse strong social dissatisfaction and senior leaders' attention. According to the governance theory, the high degree of Chinese administrative monopoly and the closed management system of competitive sports result in the failure in forming a mutually restrictive, cooperative and effective governance framework among the administration, markets and the third sectors. This is the major cause and institutional reason contributing to the spread of malpractices. To eradicate the malpractices, it's necessary to reform the existing management system of competitive sports characterized by "government monopoly". What's more, we should establish a management philosophy of "coexistence, mutual restraint, and close cooperation", and explore a competitive sport governance system with Chinese characteristics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229