绩效评估模式泛滥与绩效不彰困境——基于42个案例的分析  

The Paradox of More Performance Evaluations but Less Performance Achievements in Local Government: A Probe into 42 Evaluation Models in China

作　　者：尚虎平[1] 赵盼盼[1] 

机构地区：[1]兰州大学管理学院,副教授兰州740000

出　　处：《中国行政管理》2012年第11期18-24,共7页Chinese Public Administration

基　　金：教育部人文社科基金"数据挖掘视域下我国县(市)政府绩效评估指标筛选研究"(编号:09YJC630126);国家社科基金重大项目"幸福指数导向下我国政府绩效评估体系研究"(编号:11&ZD057);江苏高校社科基金"县级政府绩效的公民满意度测评:面向江苏的探索性研究"(编号:2010SJB630040)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：我国地方政府绩效评估出现了模式泛滥的局面,但政府绩效却依然不够理想。通过对42种模式指标体系的"直感强度"、"直感强度离中度"、"真实强度"、"真实强度离中度"的聚中、离中分析,我们发现这些模式的指标体系差别不大,只是在政治领域指标的设置上"模式"特色稍显鲜明,也有部分模式以个别指标的跳跃性赋权来彰显"模式"特色。基于这些发现,我们建议可以从国家制定共通性指标、各地依地方管理特色构造本地绩效评估指标、推行客观绩效数据挖掘以淡化"人为塑造"的痕迹、推进审议绩效评估等方面着手来破解模式"多样"但绩效依然低下的难题。In China, local government performance evaluations have evolved into a ＂model colonization＂ situation, and there are a lot of local governments who claim that they have already developed many new ＂models＂ of performance evaluation though they still remain in low efficiency. We probe into 42 ＂models＂ of performance evaluation in varied local governments to find that judged by the statistic results of ＂straight sense strength＂, ＂distance between straight sense strength and the mean＂, ＂real strength＂, and ＂distance between real strength and the mean＂, the models have no obvious differences in spite of the propa- gandas on how different the models are. On the basis of the findings, we propose to develop common indicators by the state level authorities, prepare special management modes according to local structures, implement performance data mining to weaken ＂artificial shaping＂ influences.

关 键 词：绩效评估 地方政府 离中度 

分 类 号：D630.3[政治法律—政治学]