检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《基层医学论坛》2012年第28期3691-3693,共3页The Medical Forum
摘 要:目的观察比较输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术和体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管膀胱壁段结石的临床疗效。方法 64例输尿管膀胱壁段结石患者,34例采用ESWL治疗,30例采用钬激光碎石术治疗。结果钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管膀胱壁段结石有效率为100%,明显高于ESWL组的58.8%。结论输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管膀胱壁段结石安全有效,成功率高,并发症少,是首选的治疗方法。Objective To compare the clinical effect of uretemscopic holmium laser and ESWL for the treatment of ureteral calculi In the bladder location.Methods Clinical data of 64 patients with ureteral calculi who underwent ureteroscopic was analyzed by restrospective, induded 30 cases of holmium laser lithotripsy and 34 cases of ESWL. Results For the treatment of ureteral calculi In the bladder location, holmium laser have a high success rate (100%) than ESWL (58.8%).Conclusion Ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy is effect on ureteral calculi In the bladder location with safety, high successes rate and little complication.
关 键 词:输尿管膀胱壁段结石 输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术 体外冲击波碎石术 疗效
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222