检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡逸林[1] 曹庭加[1] 蔡逊[1] 李汉军[1] 刘颜良[1] 汪波[1]
机构地区:[1]广州军区武汉总医院普通外科,湖北武汉430070
出 处:《现代生物医学进展》2012年第25期4858-4862,共5页Progress in Modern Biomedicine
摘 要:目的:探讨应用脾动脉结扎法行全腹腔镜巨脾切除术的安全性、可行性及手术技巧。方法:将2010年1月1日至2012年1月1日因肝硬化门脉高压脾机能亢进巨脾患者随机分为腹腔镜脾切除(Laparoscopic Splenectomy,LS)组及开腹脾切除(OpenSplenectomy,OS)组,比较两组的临床特征及围手术期差异。结果:LS组与OS组在性别组成、术前肝功能child分级、年龄组成及脾脏长径方面均无统计学意义。LS组手术时间比OS组略长,但无统计学意义,LS组术中出血量明显低于OS组(P<0.01),LS组术后进食、术后排气、引流管拔除及出院时间均明显早于OS组(P<0.01)。结论:腹腔镜脾切除术为治疗门脉高压巨脾的一种有效、安全、可行的手术方式。Objective: To investigate the safety,feasibility and surgical techniques with splenic artery ligation in total laparoscopic massive splenectomy.Methods: From January 1,2010 to January 1,2012,patients with hypertension due to cirrhosis of the liver spleen hyperfunction massive splenectomy were randomly assigned into laparoscopic splenectomy group and Open Splenectomy group.Com-pare the two groups in clinical characteristics and differences in the perioperative period.Results: Between the two groups,the differ-ences in gender composition,age,child classification and the diameter in the spleen were not statistically significant.LS group operative time was slightly longer than that in the OS group,but the difference had no statistical significance.LS group blood loss was significantly lower than that in the OS group(P0.01).The time of postoperative feeding,farting,postoperative tube remove,postopera-tive hospital stay in LS group were significantly earlier than that in the OS group(P0.01).Conclusions: Total laparoscopic massive splenectomy is safe,feasible and effective to treatment portal hypertension.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44