检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐国华[1] 田伟明[1] 柴仪[1] 温志刚[1]
机构地区:[1]河北省中医院,石家庄050011
出 处:《中国中医基础医学杂志》2012年第10期1118-1119,共2页JOURNAL OF BASIC CHINESE MEDICINE
基 金:河北省科技厅科技攻关指导计划项目(11276169)
摘 要:目的:观察骨复活汤和介入治疗激素性股骨头缺血性坏死国际分期法I期的临床疗效。方法:自拟骨复活汤和介入治疗I期26例,与仙灵骨葆和介入治疗I期24例作对比。结果:治疗组36例髋,总有效率94.4%;对照组35例髋,总有效率77.1%。2组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05),治疗组分期及对照组分期分别与疗效比较均有极显著性差异(P<0.005)。结论:骨复活汤和介入治疗优于仙灵骨葆和介入治疗早期激素性股骨头缺血性坏死的疗效,分期与疗效密切相关,早期发现治疗效果较好。Objective: To compare Gufuhuotang and Interventional Therapy and Xianlinggubao and Interventional Therapy short-term clinical efficacy of treatment Adult SANFH in International Ⅰ phases. Methods: 26 cases in I phases were treated with Gufuhuotang and Interventional Therapy, compared with 24 cases with Xianlinggubao and Interventional Therapy. Results: Of 36 hips of treatment group, the effectiveness was 94.4% ; Of 35 hips of control group, the effectiveness was 77.1% ; There was significant difference by test(P 〈0.05) , so the curative effect of treatment group is better than control group (P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion: To treat Adult SANFH in International Ⅰ phases, Gufuhuotang and Interventional Therapy is better than Xianlinggubao and Interventional Therapy; the curative effect is closely connected with the phases, the earlier, the better.
关 键 词:激素性股骨头缺血性坏死 骨复活汤 介入治疗 临床研究
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7