毫针点刺加参麦液注射配合个性化鞋疗治疗跟痛症的临床研究  

Clinical study on filiform needle pricking and Shenmai solution injection plus characteristic shoe therapy in the treatment of calcaneodynia

作　　者：许学猛[1] 孙正平[2] 曾科学[1] 林晓洁[1] 赵传喜[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省第二中医院,广东广州510095 [2]广州中医药大学,广东广州510405

出　　处：《现代中西医结合杂志》2012年第31期3421-3422,共2页Modern Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine

基　　金：广东省第二批产业技术研究与开发资金计划项目(2009B040704003)

摘　　要：目的观察毫针点刺加参麦液注射配合个性化鞋疗治疗跟痛症的临床疗效。方法 66例跟痛症患者随机分为试验组和对照组,试验组33例采用毫针点刺加参麦液注射配合个性化鞋疗(综合疗法),对照组33例采用醋酸曲安奈德注射液局部封闭治疗,2组均1次/周,共治疗3次。结果治疗前和治疗后2周2组VAS评分比较均无显著性差异,治疗6个月后试验组疗效优于对照组(P<0.01)。结论综合疗法与局部封闭治疗跟痛症均能在短期内缓解疼痛,但治疗6个月后其疗效优于局部封闭。Objective It is to observe the clinical therapeutic effects of filiform needle pricking, Shenmai solution injection plus characteristic shoe therapy in the treatment of calcaneodynia. Methods Sixty-six cases of calcaneodynia patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. In the treatment group, 33 cases were applied with filiform needle pricking, Shenmai solution injection plus characteristic shoe therapy. In the control group, 33 cases were applied with triamcinolone acetonide acetate injection for partial closure. All the cases in both groups were treated once per week for continuous three weeks. Results There was no significant difference in VAS score value between the two groups before treatment and in two weeks after treatments. However, after six months of treatments, the therapeutic efficacy in treatment group was better than that in control group （P 〈 0. 01 ）. Conclusion Both the comprehensive therapy and the partial closure therapy for calcaneodynia could relieve pain in the short term, but after six months treatments, the therapeutic efficacy of the former was superior to that of the latter.

关 键 词：毫针点刺 参麦液 个性化鞋疗 跟痛症 

分 类 号：R68[医药卫生—骨科学]