检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学管理学院 [2]浙江理工大学服装学院,杭州310058
出 处:《软科学》2012年第10期86-88,112,共4页Soft Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(70971117);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(0902061-B)
摘 要:采用两因素组间实验设计与情境法,设计四种模式的同级评价情境,探讨同级评价模式对员工个体创新意愿的影响。方差分析的结果表明:同级评价导向和评价性质的交互作用显著,当同级依据结果进行评价时,负面评价比正面评价更有助于激发个体创新;当同级给予正面评价时,过程导向的评价比结果导向的评价更有助于激发个体创新努力。This paper adopted 2 ~ 2 (evaluation property and evaluation orientation) two factors between subjects design, with four kinds of evaluation settings, and then analyzes the impact of peer evaluation on the individual innovative tendency. Result showed that the interaction of type of evaluation property and evaluation orientation were significant. When colleague evaluation was based on individual outcome, the negative evaluation would be more effective to promote individual creative motivation. When colleague used negative evaluation, evaluation based on individual outcome would be more effective to in- dividual creative motivation than based on individual process effort.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28